------=_NextPart_000_0381_01BF365A.5A3284C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I seem to have solved my own problem with update subaccounts set =
saexpirdate =3D null.
now everything seems to work better.
Thanks,
Ken
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Kenneth Gustav Eitenmiller Jr=20
To: Emerald Mailing List=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 08:26
Subject: [Emerald] billing
When billing the master billing record is updated to the new expire =
date, but the service expire date stays the same...
Do the service expire dates need to be "blank" for them to use the =
master billing record expire dates?
I have MANY users that can not get on this morning with "good" master =
billing record expire dates, but "bad" service expire dates.
Thanks,
Ken
Kenneth Gustav Eitenmiller Jr
Network Support Specialist
keitenmiller@hughestech.net
----------------------------------------------
www.hughestech.net
Hughes Business Technologies
7825 Forest Hills Road
Rockford, Illinois 61111
815-282-5151
815-282-5529 FAX
------=_NextPart_000_0381_01BF365A.5A3284C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
------=_NextPart_000_0381_01BF365A.5A3284C0------- Original Message -----From:=20 Kenneth Gustav Eitenmiller Jr =Sent: Wednesday, November 24, =1999=20 08:26Subject: [Emerald] =billingWhen billing the master billing =record is updated=20 to the new expire date, but the service expire date stays the=20 same...Do the service expire dates need to =be "blank"=20 for them to use the master billing record expire dates?I have MANY users that can not get on =this=20 morning with "good" master billing record expire dates, but "bad" =service=20 expire dates.Thanks,KenKenneth Gustav Eitenmiller =Jr
Network Support=20 Specialistwww.hughestech.net
Hughes Business = Technologies
7825 Forest Hills Road
Rockford, Illinois=20 61111
815-282-5151
815-282-5529=20FAX