----- Original Message -----
From: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
To: <emerald@iea-software.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Emerald] Work on SNMP Concurrency Checking
> Randy Martin wrote:
> >
> > I don't mean to jump into the middle of this, but isn't the above the
> > NON-SNMP concurrency doing it's job correctly? It did the radcheckonline
> > and found the user already online. It doesn't seem to me that you should
> > need both? I don't have the SNMP concurrency setup, and everything works
> > just fine on our system. Is there only certain combinations of NAS's
etc.
> > that have a problem with the non-SNMP concurrency checking?
> >
> > >Apr 18 15:06:03 2000 [INFO]: SQL Statement: {CALL
> > >RadCheckOnlineSNMP('ejluckey')}
> > >Apr 18 15:06:03 2000 [INFO]: Server:tcm-glenelder
> > >SNMPUser:.1.3.6.1.4.1.429.4.10.1.1.18.1788 User:ejluckey
> > >Sending Ack of id 111 to d12a4f23 (tcm-glenelder)
>
> Assuming that the customer's login limit is 1, the SNMP verified
> that the customer is indeed on-line and should not be allowed on
> again. If the string after the User: does not match the auth name,
> then the SNMP checking would ignore the on-line entry, to prevent
> false denial.
>
> --
>
> Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT
> __________________________________________
> IEA Software, Inc. www.iea-software.com
>
> For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
> http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart
For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart