Re: [Emerald] I need your help!!!! AGAIN!!!

Geoffrey L. Scully ( (no email) )
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:51:06 -0800

Thanks for the input. My main concern is that we have two remote sites and I would
like to keep the authentication there. Less traffic and faster this way. Also not
as many lost packets and other associated problems. We have puters with SQL on
them at these sites now so I think we might just put Radius on these machines and
let it be that.

Ben Conner wrote:

> Hi Geoff,
>
> At 07:19 AM 3/12/99 -0800, you wrote:
> >So if I use one machine for Radius and another for Emerald then will this
> >actually take much of the load off of the Emerald Server? Right now the
> >Emerald Server is the Radius Server and I do not like that. I just want to
> >keep what does not need be on the Accounting " Emerald " Server and "T"
> >Spans off of them.
>
> For maximum efficiency, you would want your SQL Server to run by itself on a
> single machine, and perhaps your RadiusNT package to do the same. The overhead
> produced by RadiusNT is pretty light...it wouldn't have to be that powerful a
> box.
>
> Emerald is a client and can run on anything you have around, as long as it has
> (in my opinion) 32 meg of memory or more.
>
> --Ben
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> + Ben Conner ben@webworldinc.com +
> + Web World, Inc. (714) 639-0595 voice +
> + PO Box 6548-107 (714) 744-4825 fax +
> + Orange, Ca 92863 +
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> For more information about this list, including removal,
> please see http://www.iea-software.com/maillist.html

For more information about this list, including removal,
please see http://www.iea-software.com/maillist.html