RE: [Emerald] The billing problem is back!!! V 2.5.287

Todd Hutchinson ( emerald@fisolutions.com )
Wed, 9 Jun 1999 07:14:16 -0700

Please disregard this was in an out box that must not have been sent. Which explains why I had to retype it once.

Sorry
Todd Hutchinson

-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Hutchinson [SMTP:emerald@fisolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 1999 4:58 PM
To: 'emerald@iea-software.com'
Subject: RE: [Emerald] The billing problem is back!!! V 2.5.287

So, "it doesn't work" is not the question, the question is when will it?
Also how do we get onto the beta list? We have a small enough group of
users that we can work on emerald at 2am and not be bumping anyone off line
when we reboot machines.

I know that you field most of the questions here, I informed you that it
stopped working back around 2.5.227. Then you fixed it, somewhere around
2.5.243 and sometime later it stopped working again around 2.5.287.

-Todd Hutchinson

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale E. Reed Jr. [SMTP:daler@iea-software.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 1999 10:09 PM
To: emerald@iea-software.com
Subject: Re: [Emerald] The billing problem is back!!! V 2.5.287

Todd Hutchinson wrote:
>
> When you invoice next term the amount is correct in the total
box, but the balance field in wrong by 4 cents.
>
> Amounts used.
>
> Term 12 months
> Discount 16.9454
> amount 14.95
>
> Total for the year that we want is 149.00 Not 149.04

This has been discussed a lot here and the archive contains a full
summary of it. The problem with 149.00, if that it simply doesn't
work. If you look at your amount*quantity on the invoice, it does
NOT match the invoice total on the old ones of 149.00.

--

Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT__________________________________________IEA Software, Inc. www.iea-software.com